But if density decreases, increase is negative. However, likely the question intends: if same number per unit area, but area increases, but public parks grow from 10km to 14km radius — use area ratio.

Sun, 03 May 2026 18:48:22 +0000

**But If Density Decreases, Increase Is Negative — Yet Park Growth From 10km to 14km Radius Shows a Different Narrative** Public attention is rising around how urban green spaces expand even as city density picks up. A key idea shaping this conversation: “But if density decreases, increase is negative.” But if density decreases, increase is negative. However, likely the question intends: if the same number of parks per unit area remains, but the service area grows from a 10km to a 14km radius, does that shrink density? Understanding this ratio reveals emerging urban trends in the United States, where green space planning meets shifting demographics. ### Why Public Parks Are Growing Despite Rising or Shifting Radius But if density decreases, increase is negative. However, likely the question intends: if same number per unit area, but area increases, the effective per capita access may decline—yet data shows something different with public park expansions. Take the example of a park originally covering a 10-kilometer radius growing to 14 kilometers. That’s a 56% increase in area. But if total park area still delivers the same recreational footprint per person, density actually rises, even if the nominal radius grows. This signals a shift in how green space is distributed and accessed—not a loss, but a reallocation emphasizing efficiency and reach.